Data Integrity & Audit Trail
Every number traces back to the record it came from — including the ones from last year.
What This Solves
A reported figure is only as good as the trail behind it. When that trail is a chain of spreadsheets, an audit request or a diligence question becomes an archaeology project.
The problem compounds. A restatement six months later means reconstructing not just the number but the version of the number that was circulated at the time.
The support behind every reported figure:
- Reconciliation status by account and period
- Break register with age and owner
- Approval history per report
- Source lineage on demand
What DynamicHQI Does
Reconciliation as a step, not a scramble
Positions and balances reconciled against custodian and administrator records on a schedule, with breaks surfaced rather than absorbed.
Source lineage on every figure
Each reported number carries a path back to the underlying record and the date it was received.
Human approval, recorded
Figures move to reported status when a person approves them. Who approved what, and when, is retained.
Point-in-time reconstruction
Reproduce what a report said on the day it was issued, alongside what the same period says now.
Integrity is enforced at reconcile and again at review — the two steps nobody sees and everybody depends on. See our data process →
See It On Your Data
Bring a period you already reported on, and we will show you the same numbers with the trail attached.